Campaign One · Phase 1 — the map, live

Every check, as it lands.

One row per retracted paper, checked against the citation graph. Newest first, all of them — no highlights reel, no picking. A citation after retraction is a flag: the correction never reached the citer. Work downstream of a flag is exposed to the retracted result. It warrants re-examination. It is not wrong.

Method in one line: retraction dates from Crossref updated-by events; citations from the OpenAlex graph; the whole corpus, checked whole. The full method: Campaign One. The data behind this page: feed.json — re-run it.

First run in progress — checks will stream here.

How to read this feed

• Cited after retraction means the paper kept collecting citations after its retraction date. It is a flag, not an accusation — authors usually cannot know, because the system never carried the correction to them.
• Downstream citations are the citations received by the papers that cited the retracted work after its death. That work is exposed to the retracted result and warrants re-examination. Exposure is not error. A downstream paper is not thereby wrong — nobody here prints that word about downstream work.
• Clean means no citations after the retraction date. The correction, for once, held.
• Retraction facts are cross-checked between Crossref and OpenAlex. Where the two sources differ on a record, the row says so and the record is flagged for review.
• Anyone named in a result has a right of reply, attached to the record. Flags are flags, not verdicts.